'Conflict and Reconciliation Essay\r'

'A disk operating system in the main consists of trio vital things, without which a state would no largeer be c every(prenominal)ed a state. These three things namely †muckle, territory and government. The three of them ar dependent and interdependent on each other. It is heavy to hasten them dislocated and be claimed as the sole origin of a problem. The territory is non in our hands, this is the land that we got after independence. The government is what runs the hoidenish, but, in that respect is nonhing that we, citizens send away do. All we go to do is elect a substitute lay outy of the government both quaternity years.\r\nAnd lastly, we have the wad of the country. This is yet a nonher(prenominal) vital comp superstarnt of a state. Without this, a state would be a delinquent mo of land. (Muller, 2005) thither have been instances where the questionable peck of the land atomic number 18 non wizard(a). In fact, there have been competitivenesss mingled with the peck. Well, there atomic number 18 a assign of conflicts. only when it is neer the conflict that is harmful, it is never the bump around of psyches that breaks the country, but the behavior of the conflict is what drives mess out-of-door from being one. at a time there is a rift in the midst of them, there is no going back.\r\nIt is arduous to bring the slew out from their there stem built in schemas. After a conflict which has taken out quiescence form one sect of the country, it is problematic to have them stop stereotyping the other one. in that location is a key word that I have used in the previous sentence. The word sect caught my attention as briefly as I was watch writing the sentence. I ask myself, is our country divided into sects? Is that what is causing the conflict? Is it the understanding of the rifts that take place every daylight? Is it the cause of the grudges built in mint?\r\nIs this what makes them stereotype others that be non in their sect? Well, after hours of pondering, I feel out yes. This is why we ar not one. This is on the button why we can not have a civil discussion among people of unalike sects without having all clash of ideas. The constituent of sects in the country is the very intellect of as to why we give the term â€Å"Many Americas” to this country. Let’s consider a couple of mannequins that might reboot us and might bring us to a conclusion that the division of people into sects is not the only cause of the so-c entirelyed â€Å"Many Americas”.\r\nThere is no head that we have unalike communities in this country. Well, every kingdom does, it is not like our nation is different from the rest. It is precisely that we do not have to over look the priorities and the benefits of the sects that ar sm all in all in number. It is human nature to consider the things that atomic number 18 obvious and are right in preceding of us. Although it is not right not to consider the sects that are in minority. Lets take an example of the people contemporarily living in the country.\r\nWe have a pile of Indians present, several(prenominal) are working, nearly are studying and some are living as dirty immigrants. In fact a lot of them are living as illegal immigrants. Definitely, the clash of ideas and compromise has to be there. Without compromise, the clash of ideas amongst them, will grow and will soon wear out into huge unsolved rifts. This is meet one trivial example. only if to reboot that I am not considering the illegal immigrants, who are staying in the country because they indigence to and not because they can stay? Their headland is pretty different.\r\nIf they can not be hired for any job because they do not hold a qualifying or a green mental capacity or hold a long expired visa †well, they are to blame. There are different cultures, different religions, different races, cultures, beliefs, doctrines, creed , show. There is so a great deal that has been separating us. This is what people usually register. I do not second their notion. It is highly incorrect for them to cite that if some one is in the minority, they do not belong to this nation. If some one has a different skin color than me, they are honorable different. Well, I say such people are cryptograph but shallow.\r\nThere is not much that we can do to make them contort around and understand that although there are people of different doctrines living in the aforementioned(prenominal) nibble of land as us, but they are still Americans, they are still a part of us. adept telling them that they are equipment casualty is not going to change any thing. The schemas that people develop and stick to the fore move of the minds of the people, do not skillful develop in a day. It takes a lot of years to develop them and it takes alone seconds to make them even worst. By this I hatch that it is difficult to drive the schem as out, however, it is not difficult to build upon them.\r\nIt is easier said than done. Many Americas is not many, its just one. It’s a national of perception. Let’s take a trivial yet crucial example of the positive instances never being counted or accounted for. I was with my friends at the beach. The Indians at nurture are known for stealing trinkets from the kids at school. My friend’s watch got stealn from our spot. We were all worried and the first thing that she did was point â€Å"I” for stealing it. Lets take â€Å"I” as the Indian girl who was blamed. Just because she was around our spot at the beach does not necessarily mean that she stole it.\r\nWell, she was embarrassed and humiliated in front of all the kids there. It was a school agitate so all the kids from school were there. Her stainless bag was toppled; all the things inside it were forcibly thrown out of it. I try to stop my friend but, she would just not let it go; it wa s an expensive watch. Well, at the end we found out that some one’s dog took it. But the point of the entire story is that she did not do it. Even after the incident, they all still blamed the Indians for taking away things ever time something got lost. It is not a payoff to be proud of.\r\nWe are all one. We are all one nation. It is ok to share the same piece of land with some one who is a little different from us. Although this was just one example, there are many others that I will be mentioning about in the final paper. The entire point of this uncut draft is that no matter how different one may be, we are all living and sharing the same piece of land. The belief that this is my land more that it is yours just because there are more people like me on this land than you; this idea is to be driven out of our heads as soon as we can in the beginning matters worsen.\r\nThere is not much that we can do to make them forget the existent schemas and understand that although th ere are people of different doctrines and beliefs, living in the same piece of land we are, but they are still Americans, just like us and they are still a part of us. We all together make this nation. It is not just one sect or two, it is many Americas that make this beautiful, peaceful country, our country. And just telling those people that they are wrong is not going to change any thing.\r\nThe schemas that people develop and stick to the fore front of the minds of the people, do not just develop in a day. It takes a lot of years to develop them and it takes just seconds to make them even worst. By this I mean that it is difficult to drive the schemas out, however, it is not difficult to build upon them. Hence, we are exclusively one nation no matter how many creeds and sects our nation has. \\\r\nReference:\r\nDavid J. Whittaker, affair and Reconciliation in the Contemporary sphere Gilbert H. Muller, Many Americas Reading and paper across the Cultural Divides\r\n'