The Disagreement on Human nature among the Greatest Philosophers Article

The unlikeness on Hu composition record among the Greatest Philosophers - Article ExamplePlato gave his Allegory of the Cave explaining this habitual spirit (Soccio 141). A man lives all his life in a cave, he considers his environment as the alone reality as if nothing exists outside of it. On exposing him to the sunlight, this person thinks he is dreaming, that the fresh air, green grass, and the apprisal birds are hallucinations. The habitual nature of human is Platos version. Aristotle and Kant, on the other hand, focused more on how humans should behave the maxim behind e truly action. Aristotle gave two levels of human behavior the one where he only acts like a man and the other where he acts as if there is a miraculous spirit within him, thus achieving a life higher than mere human nature (Aristotle 191). This is very different from Platos narrative because Kant implies that man by nature is evil or corrupt then he has to conform to the moral law in order to live a bet ter life. He is not simply a product of its environment, he is inherently corrupt. It is hard to pick one supposition and reject the other. It will also be negating the introduction that there is no absolute truth or knowledge. In Kants theory, there is space for spirituality. There must be divine authority overseeing mans activities. Plato, on the other hand, is more supportive of nurture as opposed to nature. Kant considers human nature as a composition of feelings, one relation and cognition, and these aspects are governed by a priory prescribed by a higher cognitive power (Frierson 13) Descartes is also in agreement with Kant that there is a divine authority. And hence man has a defined nature. Ren Descartess held anti-elitist and egalitarian views on human nature (Lopston 24). It also implies that considering this present one has to accept that humans have been created as part of a grand design.