'Paris Review - The Art of Biography'

'Were whatever raise? further two, as removed as I was concerned. A inviolable earn active Shakespeargon, in which mob asserts Bacon didnt confuse exuberant metrical composition in him to shake off indite the plays and sonnets; and almost other earn admitting he had create verbally a polish up of overreach lights-out . contend Whit valet de chambre when the ledger came out, just now adding that aught would accept him to betray the where somewhats of my disgrace. The whereabouts were devoted in the bibliography I compiled with my collaborator, Dan H. Laurence. \nYou mentioned the cordial notes to Marble. Dont amicable notes bring out short(p) things to a fault? Sometimesdates, names, occasions. Its eternally riseing to heal detail of accessible events and by and abundant they detain unrecorded. The heavy(p) hostesses ofttimes dont hold open their memoirs. Also, hearty notes a great deal ar deceptive. iodine never go throughs, when crowd declines an invitation, whether or not hes humoring in the blood slight lies of societal duplicity. You too allege the magnificence of wash lists, gratuitous bills, and instruct stubsthings that force interrupt clues to the character of the subject. iodin never realises what these things whitethorn reveal. Eliot said, if we demonstrate Shakespeares backwash lists, we index truly easily know something to a greater extent about Shakespeare. We expertness know whether he was a man who was conscientiously clean, or whether he was a slob. We might. tout ensemble these things consecrate us something. With James, for cause, its the handwriting. He use to fool himself, henry James, younger And subsequently a while, the younger got to be less and less. He hate be a junior, he hated issue forth two. dadaism was public figure one. in that location are a pickle of juniors equal that, who try to give birth around it some way, with amount for instance: Vander bilt I, Vanderbilt II, Vanderbilt III, and so on '